Home Environment Sticking to the Gujarat government's version

Sticking to the Gujarat government’s version

Details
Published on Sunday
04 April 2010 16:59
Written by Radical Socialist
 
This article originally appeared in THE HOOT, http://www.thehoot.org/web/home/story.php?storyid=4439&mod=1&pg=1&sectionId=20&valid=true and is reproduced with the permission of the author.

Does the Narmada issue and its emotive appeal in Gujarat predetermine the stylistic and editorial cuts in such a way that ‘an official’s version’ is zealously embraced, putting aside all the qualms about verifying the truth, asks HIMANSHU UPADHYAYA.

 
Posted in THE HOOT Sunday, Apr 04 19:01:50, 2010

Try searching the news on Narmada, on the day after a crucial meeting of Environment Sub Group of Narmada Control Authority [NCA] to figure out what was on the agenda and what was decided upon, by whom, when, how and why. Although the meeting was scheduled to take place in New Delhi, the only three news clips from English language newspapers that you come across all originate from Gandhinagar and are all based on the ‘reported speech’ by Gujarat state officials attending the meeting. If Shubhalaxmi Shukla on April 01, 2010 is quoting the view of B N Navalawala – advisor to Chief minister on water management ‘ on the MoEF appointed Experts Committee (can view online here) two news clips in The Indian Express and the Time of India on April 02 also merely quote what officials on return from meeting in New Delhi told them here and here.

Journalists writing on the most controversial dam appears to merely hold mike to ‘officials’ just like they did during August 2008. For an analysis of how ‘news’ and ‘decision’ were manufactured then see here.

For example, when Shubhalaxmi Shukla quotes Navalawala stating, “The committee has no locus-standi. Under the Narmada Water Dispute Tribunal Award, 1979, the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) is supposed to oversee the environmental and rehabilitation work taken under the Sardar Sarovar Project. NCA has set up two subgroups of committees to monitor proper implementation of the project. The Pandey committee is ultra vires to the NCA,” doesn’t she feel any need to pose a counter-question, “if it was so, how would Navalawala explain that the decision to constitute the said committee was taken at 46th meeting of Environment Sub Group of NCA, and why didn’t Gujarat approach the apex court immediately after the MoEF memorandum constituting the committee dated July 09, 2008”?

She quotes the interim report of the said committee but glosses over the ‘official claims’ that  the committee is ultra vires by not asking crucial questions. The two news clips from April 02, 2010 claim that the report in question “was not considered at the meeting”. The Times of India even goes to the extent of carrying the biased view of an ‘official’ verbatim; “state officials attending the meeting said, the environmental sub-committee clearance was crucial because “anti-dam forces” had been pinning hope on recommendations of a recent committee appointed by the Union environment and forests ministry.” One needs to keep in mind that the same newspaper (Times of India) reported on 27th August 2008 that the experts’ committee ensued from lobbying by ‘environment lobby,’ although the decision to constitute the committee was taken at 46th meeting on Environment Sub Group of NCA.

However, these journalists who willingly flow along with the ‘official’ view, don’t appear to be asking whether the decision to raise the height met with any dissenting note. There are chances that we would never know, because the ex secretary MoEF, Shree Prodipto Ghosh laid down procedures that even if one/some member/s of the Environment Sub Group had dissent with the decision, s/he/they will not be allowed to share their ‘dissenting views’ with media.

What is even more surprising is the fact that not only did the ‘decision’ smack of political expediency, it also came close on the hills of two CAG audit reports both critical of the Gujarat Government on environmental and fiscal compliance. It should not betaken to be a mere coincidence that the news release by Press Trust of India on April 01 stated, “A delegation of Congress MPs from Gujarat today met Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi with demands for speeding up infrastructure development related to river Narmada” and they sought intervention by Jairam Ramesh “to speed up clearances for the projects at Kevadia under which piers, bridges and gates of the dam are to be constructed”. (see here http://www.ptinews.com/news/592334_Cong-delegation-meets-PM–Sonia-over-Narmada-projects)

The CAG audit report on Gujarat (Civil) reports the findings of Integrated Audit of Forest Department reporting non-compliance on compensatory afforestation. It stated [CAG 2010: 111] “Scrutiny of records of PCCF revealed that since 1980, 14,835 hectare forest land was diverted for which Rs.94.37 crore were recovered from 958 user agencies between 1980 and 2007 as cost towards afforestation. Against the above, afforestation was to be taken up at 32,360 hectare, however, achievement was 24,382 hectare (75 per cent) only. Of Rs.94.37 crore recovered, Rs.40.82 crore was spent on Compensatory Afforestation.”

The CAG audit report on Gujarat (commercial), tabled in assembly  on March 30th also likewise reported how Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited ‘ the state owned dam building corporation ‘ violated norms by diverting the central assistance received under Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme [AIBP] on works other than the ‘stated purpose’.

Shouldn’t the Environment Sub Group and Ministry of Environment and Forests look into these audit findings on non-compliance on environmental and fiscal matters by SSNNL? Shouldn’t they read and interpret these audit remarks ‘ and SSNNL’s unwillingness to file reply on them ‘ as providing a corollary to the view of theDevedra Pande committee [Dr Devendra Pande is a former Director General of Forest Survey of India] that the permission to raise the height of the dam shall not be granted?

Does the Narmada issue and its emotive appeal in Gujarat predetermine the stylistic and editorial cuts in such a way that ‘an official’s version’ is zealously embraced, putting aside all the qualms about verifying the truth?

The author work with Environics Trust and has a keen interest in media coverage of environmental issues.

RELATED ARTICLES

The Struggle for Food Sovereignty in Tunisia

Details Published on Wednesday 07 November 2018 16:20 Written by Radical Socialist

IPCC recognizes inequality as a key for “climate risk”. But we must go much further than that.

Details Published on Saturday 19 April 2014 10:40 Written by Radical Socialist

Most Popular

The Main Enemy is At Home (ICS Statement on Pokharan II Blast

Details Published on Tuesday 03 July 2012 16:44 Written by Radical Socialist

Socialists in Lebanon condemn attack on Syrian refugees

Details Published on Monday 17 July 2017 15:24 Written by Radical Socialist Lebanon Statement of condemnation and clarification by the Socialist Forum This statement was issued by the Socialist...

Alexis, what have you done with our victory?

Details Published on Thursday 16 July 2015 14:24 Written by Radical Socialist Alexis, what have you done with our victory? Tuesday 14 July 2015, by Andreas Sartzekis OKDE-Spartakos   61.3 % vote...

The victories “ and continuing struggles “ of women in Sudan

Details Published on Saturday 29 June 2019 15:41 Written by Radical Socialist Nada Mustafa Ali One of the most popular images from Sudan’s protests that led to the...

Mexican electrical union fights for its life

Details Published on Friday 06 November 2009 13:18 Written by Radical Socialist Dan La Botz   The Mexican Electrical Workers Union (SME), made up of approximately 43,000 active and 22,000...

Ranil is the best friend of Mahinda regime

Details Published on Sunday 19 September 2010 15:12 Written by Radical Socialist Statement of the Nava Sama Samaj Party (Sri Lankan Section of the Fourth International) (13 September 2010) The...

Contribution to the debate on the Role and Tasks of the FI in the form of amendments

Details Published on Tuesday 15 December 2009 12:10Written by Radical Socialist

Greece and the world capitalist crisis

Details Published on Tuesday 20 April 2010 03:48 Written by Radical Socialist Savas Michael-Matsas A Greek tragedy? “All the world’s a stage”   After the October 4, 2009 parliamentary elections in Greece,...

ALGERIA “The West prefers a regime subject to its interests

Details Published on Thursday 06 June 2019 16:53 Written by Radical Socialist INTERVIEW WITH HOCINE BELALLOUFI Wednesday 5 June 2019, by Hocine Belalloufi Hocine Belalloufi is a journalist and a...