Home Environment Effluent Treatment Facilities across Golden Corridor does not conform to GPCB Norms

Effluent Treatment Facilities across Golden Corridor does not conform to GPCB Norms

Details
Published on Tuesday
08 June 2010 04:00
Written by Radical Socialist

Press Release

Date: 4th June 2010

Effluent Treatment Facilities across Golden Corridor does not conform to GPCB Norms.

BUT WHO CARES?

Stop effluent discharge at Tadgam Sarigam Pipeline, from FETP, Ankleshwar, ECP, Vadodara, CETPs of Ahmedabad as the effluent is not able to meet the norms prescribed by Gujarat Pollution Control Board.

– Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti

The problem of industrial pollution first came to light in the nineties, when the issue gained momentum among urban entities about a decade after the Bhopal disaster. Due to pressure from various communities and environmental organizations, courts began intervening in cases to ultimately build the waste “treatment facilities” that exist today. These actions, which were championed by the media, created an entire culture of complacence that “something” great had been done about the pollution. There was a collective urban sentiment that citizens were protected from industries because of the mitigation infrastructure. Despite the “Polluter Pays” principle, even in the nineties the then developing common effluent treatment plants (CETPs) were highly supported by public money; 25% of the cost was state subsidy, 25% central subsidy, 30% loans from financial institute, and 20% directly paid by the industry. In essence half of the proposed solution to the pollution generated for private profit was funded by the general public. Moreover this happened at the same time that the state was withdrawing from its social responsibilities, such as education, health care and transportation. It seems paradoxical that the mounting laissez faire sentiment allowed the state to intervene on behalf of industries – which come to exist by virtue of concentrated resources and power – but not for the welfare of the common masses. Even after such huge investment many of the CETPs including Vapi, FETP – Ankleshwar, Panoli, Nandesari, Vatva, Odhav, Narol etc.  are not able to meet the prescribed GPCB norms.

Sarigam: Legal Notice dated 4th December 2009 issued to Sarigam Waste & Effluent Management Co. Ltd., Sarigam, District – Valsad by Gujarat Pollution Control Board under section 33-A of The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 clearly states that “[…] the consent granted to you vide order No. 1623 dated 12-2-2004 has lapsed on dated 31-3-2004 hence, at present you are operating industrial effluent disposal system without CC & A of the Gujarat Pollution control Board under the provision of Water Act.” It further states “[…] during the inspection of your plant on 18-11-2009 … The analysis reports indicates that the concentration like SS, BOD, COD, Chloride, Ammonical Nitrogen, Phenolic Compound, Zinc, & Sulphides, are most of the time higher than the permissible limit specified by the Board.” This clearly indicates that the treatment facility dumps the effluent at village Tadgam without proper permission and effluent does not meet GPCB’s norms.

Vapi CETP: The CPCB report dated 29-3-2010 indicates that effluent being discharged into Damanganga river shows COD: 869 i.e. 347.60% more (GPCB norms 250 mg/l), TDS: 9088 i.e. 432.76% more (GPCB norms 2100 mg/l), and NH3-N: 98 i.e. 196% more (GPCB norms 50 mg/l).

Ankleshwar FETP: The report dated 10-3-2010 of CPCB indicates that effluent discharged into the Gulf of Cambay shows COD: 1241 i.e. 248.20% more (GPCB norms 500 mg/l), and NH3-N: 664 i.e. 1328% more (GPCB norms 50 mg/l).

Effluent Channel Project (ECP), Vadodara: The report indicates that effluent discharged into estuary of Mahisagar river shows pH: 4.6 (GPCB norms 6.5 – 8.5), TSS: 361 (GPCB norms 100 mg/l), TDS: 14458 (GPCB norms 5000 mg/l), COD: 1826 (GPCB norms 250 mg/l), BOD: 334 (GPCB norms 100 mg/l), NH3-N: 387 (GPCB norms 50 mg/l), Cyanide: 2.857 (GPCB norms 0.2 mg/l), and Phenols: 15.37 (GPCB norms 1.0 mg/l).

Ahmedabad, CETP: (1) CETP, Vatva: The report dated 27-1-2010 of CPCB indicates that effluent discharged into Sabarmati river shows COD: 2189 i.e. 879.20% more (GPCB norms 250 mg/l), TDS: 16141 i.e. 768.60% more (GPCB norms 2100 mg/l), and NH3-N: 190 i.e. 380% more (GPCB norms 50 mg/l). (2) CETP M/s GECSL, Vatva: The report dated 29-1-2010 of CPCB indicates that effluent discharged into Sabarmati river shows COD: 1100 i.e. 440% more (GPCB norms 250 mg/l), and TDS: 2506 i.e. 119.33% more (GPCB norms 2100 mg/l). (3) CETP M/s GVMSAVL, Odhav: The report dated 28-1-2010 of CPCB indicates that effluent discharged into Sabarmati river shows COD: 7315 i.e. 2926% more (GPCB norms 250 mg/l), TDS: 6928 i.e. 329.90% more (GPCB norms 2100 mg/l), and NH3-N: 1260 i.e. 2520% more (GPCB norms 50 mg/l). (4) CETP M/s NEPL, Naroda: The report dated 28-1-2010 of CPCB indicates that effluent discharged into Sabarmati river shows COD: 2471 i.e. 988.40% more (GPCB norms 250 mg/l), TDS: 11971 i.e. 570.00% more (GPCB norms 2100 mg/l), and NH3-N: 190 i.e. 380% more (GPCB norms 50 mg/l).

An expensive distraction

In Gujarat, one of the newest such projects is the Final Effluent Treatment Plant (FETP). Touted by the Chief Minister, Mr. Narendra Modi, the Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB), and various Industries Associations as a state-of-the-art solution the structure is designed to divert industrial pollution from Amlakhadi and the Narmada River. First, all of the effluent from the CETPs at Industrial Estates at Ankleshwar, Panoli, and Jhagadia are transported to the FETP plant located in Piraman village, Ankleshwar. Next, the consolidated “treated” effluent is theoretically re-treated to meet GPCB norms. The final “treated” effluent is then transported via a 53 km pipeline to Hansot where it is ultimately discharged into the sea. Operated by Bharuch Eco Aqua Infrastructure Ltd, the pipeline was inaugurated with a capacity of 40 million liters per day (MLD), which has since been increase to 60 MLD to meet the need of the estates.

The FETP was built by the sweat of tax payers. Out of a total project cost of Rs 131.43 crores, the industries paid only Rs 21.75 crores (about 17%); the rest of the tab (Rs 109 crores) was picked up the Central Government, Gujarat Government, and Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) – all of which ultimately draw from public money. It is a familiar story: the profits are distributed privately, but the institutional costs and environmental burden are borne by general public.

The FETP was conceived to relieve local communities of the waste waters from Ankleshwar, Panoli, and Jhagadia Industrial Estates for which it is responsible. It is an open secret that the people living along Amla Khadi, however, are still suffering from industrial effluents. Any passerby can still see the colored water, and the tributary still has fluctuating acidity (some time a pH of 2 to 6). These observations suggest that illegal discharge into the Amlakhadi, the classic industrial dustbin of Ankleshwar, has not ended. But it gets more disconcerting. We investigated the performance of the FETP itself, by exercising our Right to Information regarding this essentially publicly funded and endorsed endeavor. We learned that the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) has been concerned with the prescribed norms of the FETP from the onset. As early as 2006 and repeatedly in 2007, the CPCB has noted that the FETP is not able to meet the prescribed norms. And because of that no expansions and no new industries can legally be sited in the area from 7-7-2007. At the behest of CPCB, GPCB was forced to issue a letter to the Industries Association of Ankleshwar, Panoli, and Jhagadia that no NOC could be given for new industrial and expansion in this area. Any increased traffic in the FETP would exacerbate the existing non-compliance of environmental protocols. We were shocked to discover through state documentation that between 2006 and March 2010, none of the routine monthly checking of standard pollutants in released effluent was within GPCB norms. This is not solely a failure of the FETP – the waste waters sent to the FETP (“inlet” effluent) were outside the norms in the first place – so it is also a failure of the CETP process of Ankleshwar, Panoli and Jhagadia. There is hardly any dent made by the FETP – not just that outlet norms not are achieved but even inlet norms are not met. In effect, the FETP seems to be a physical structure for consolidating and transporting waste, not for treating it. One of the main shocking information is that this plant was not able to meet the norms since 2006 even then the Chief Minister of Gujarat inaugurated a pipeline of the same plant on 25th January 2007 and Centre and State Government invested more than Rs. 100 crores in the company. The explanation for such an act was asked by us from the Chief Minister Office but there was no reply.

Environmental injustice

Adding insult to tax-payers’ injury, pollution mitigation infrastructure is as neglected as the pollutants themselves, causing a mutually reinforcing stalemate in the problem of pollution control. Yet, instead of becoming stricter with environmental clearances given to new and expanding potentially polluting industries, the Centre is taking steps to make the process more lenient so that India can march forward to “develop” without obstruction. Instead of focusing on the infrastructure that we do have and making it functional, the state seems obsessed with building new projects that tend to fail just like their predecessors.

The above open secret – realities invites strong action from GPCB under Environment Laws against all these facilities and we strongly feel that no effluent discharge should be allowed from any of these facilities with immediate effect.

We demand: Stop effluent discharge at Tadgam Sarigam Pipeline, from FETP, Ankleshwar, ECP, Vadodara, CETPs of Ahmedabad as the effluent is not able to meet the norms prescribed by Gujarat Pollution Control Board.

 

Rohit Prajapati                     Michael Mazgaonkar                       Swati Desai

Rajnibhai Dave                    Anand Mazgaonkar                         Krishnakant

Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti


VAPI

PERFORMANCE OF CETP AT VAPI- A TREND ANALYSIS BY CPCB,VADODARA

(Grab Sampling)

Sampling Location(s)

Year(s)

Parameter(s)

 

 

pH

TSS

TDS

BOD

COD

O & G

NH3-N

Inlet/Design Norms

6.5-8.5

300

400

1000

Inlet to CETP

 

2004

3.9

445

12715

1143

3165

35.7

445

 

2005

7.2

974

9803

769

2640

77

238

 

2006

1.3-6.9

296-1260

5908-8946

343-1340

1030-3111

40-59

142-333

 

04.01.2008

6.04

388

8114

560

1756

49

245

 

22.04.2008

7.14

273

7730

403

2612

158

 

17.06.2008

6.27

412

5552

719

2337

146

 

15.09.2008

7.02

342

4709

408

1180

25.6

119

 

27.11.2008

7.53

375

7475

521

1637

28

304

 

Outlet of CETP

2004

7.2

227

11238

279

1112

16.5

551

 

2005

7.2

81

10117

221

976

5.9

246

 

2006

6.3-6.5

100-2040

7172-7700

170-910

784-3394

5.9-8.7

171-239

 

May ‘07

7.2

141

9021

135

836

21

282

 

Nov ‘07

6.8

286

7720

92.5

837

234

 

04.01.2008

6.32

533

7832

240

973

17

238

 

22.04.2008

7.4

229

7960

98

996

160

 

29.05.2008

7.45

407

7027

419

1399

23.7

236

 

17.06.2008

7.10

86

5864

47

497

88

 

15.09.2008

7.54

394

4569

64

706

24.4

135

 

27.11.2008

7.66

94

8492

244

748

19

248

GPCB Standards

 

5.5-9.0

100

2100

100

250

10

50

 

CETP, Vapi Monitoring Results…..contd….

Sampling Location(s)

Year(s)

Parameter(s)

 

 

pH

TSS

TDS

BOD

COD

O & G

NH3-N

Inlet/Design Norms

6.5-8.5

300

400

1000

Inlet to CETP

18.02.2009

6.58

931

8708

910

5358

52

104

 

20.05.2009

7.13

272

6011

333

1509

117

 

02.09.2009

7.60

1215

5924

376

1324

50

63.3

 

09.12.2009

6.61

710

9580

444

1517

4.73

64.3

 

29.03.2010

6.95

1032

7791

743

2223

14

71

 

Outlet of CETP

18.02.2009

7.56

711

7298

417

1281

26

105

 

20.05.2009

7.32

460

8177

153

842

14.9

98.8

 

02.09.2009

7.32

60

5768

20

481

32

63.4

 

09.12.2009

6.90

140

8916

84

432

4.86

68

 

29.03.2010

6.99

233

9088

178

869

11

98

GPCB Standards

 

5.5-9.0

100

2100

100

250

10

50

 


ANKLESHWAR

PERFORMANCE OF FETP AT ANKLESHWAR

– A TREND ANALYSIS BY CPCB, ZOW, VADODARA

Sampling locations

Date of monitoring

Parameters

 

 

pH

TSS

TDS

COD

BOD

NH3-N

CN

Phenol

S

O&G

Inlet Design Norms

5.0-8.5

150

12000

1000

200

 

Inlet to FETP

28.06.07

6.50

445

7500

1776

453

447

7.98

BDL

55.7

 

31.10.07

6.07

721

19623

4882

1261

1021

25.7

14.4

39

 

17.01.08

8.32

503

8617

2459

820

477

0.89

8.9

2.0

31.0

 

07.03.08

7.15

402

9776

2538

688

13.3

2.4

 

22.04.08

7.00

411

10776

2408

488

496

1.98

6.06

11.2

19.5

 

27.05.08

8.67

423

10568

2698

687

1657

 

17.06.08

6.14

344

9764

2875

900

633

0.72

4.27

3.2

17

 

29.07.08

6.93

532

26922

2510

438

900

1.19

0.96

 

28.08.08

8.15

583

9838

2173

705

1269

0.31

9.48

3.96

17.8

 

26.09.08

8.60

417

6122

2323

600

749

0.71

5.45

2.8

35

 

Outlet of FETP

28.11.06

7.3

375

9130

1689

514

661

1.95

227

 

29.11.06

7.4

370

9274

2160

408

616

1.28

17

 

28.06.07

7.5

395

9274

1341

94

688

7.3

BDL

26.8

 

31.10.07

7.02

353

13567

1965

175

788

17.3

8.9

33.8

 

17.01.08

7.6

489

7954

1482

659

495

3.85

18.1

13.5

23.0

 

07.03.08

7.9

290

10304

2112

524

661

5.75

12

10.2

 

22.04.08

7.8

470

12457

2292

351

612

1.50

14.86

 

27.05.08

8.04

1220

8060

3090

708

725

0.11

13.68

14

 

17.06.08

8.0

256

9216

2483

475

454

0.21

9.47

37.3

12

 

29.07.08

7.76

273

9629

1645

356

813

0.25

34.8

22.4

 

28.08.08

8.31

563

9162

911

487

636

0.37

11.36

26.4

27.5

 

26.09.08

8.45

246

6530

1223

338

756

0.39

8.65

17.3

14.0

GPCB Outlet Norms

 

6.5-8.5

100

500

100

50

0.2

5

5

20

 


PERFORMANCE OF FETP AT ANKLESHWAR

–  A TREND ANALYSIS BY CPCB, ZOW, VADODARA

Sampling locations

 

Date of monitoring

Parameters

 

 

 

pH

TSS

TDS

COD

BOD

NH3-N

CN

Phenol

S

O&G

 

Inlet Design Norms

5.0-8.5

150

12000

1000

200

 

Inlet to FETP

22.10.2008

7.8

298

9546

2547

926

738

9.54

3.4

 

07.11.2008

8.15

281

11012

2357

840

695

2.01

5.62

4.0

30

 

19.12.2008

8.31

856

7488

3764

1033

32

10.67

 

28.01.2009

6.73

511

8553

4127

852

399.2

13.6

 

05.03.2009

7.67

747

29081

2495

733

371.3

0.27

7.35

3.87

60

 

Outlet of FETP

22.10.2008

8.4

553

11420

2303

857

953

1.85

13.60

34.2

38.0

 

07.11.2008

8.37

386

11167

2613

885

708

0.91

10.19

38.1

20.0

 

19.12.2008

8.23

571

11780

3008

721

338

5.64

 

28.01.2009

7.97

430

9151

4158

728

642.6

19.33

65.9

47

 

05.03.2009

8.20

397

11853

2779

630

690.4

0.21

9.37

62.5

19.5

GPCB Outlet Norms

 

6.5-8.5

100

500

100

50

0.2

5

5

20

 

Note: All values except pH are expressed in mg/l

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


PERFORMANCE OF FETP AT ANKLESHWAR

– A TREND ANALYSIS BY CPCB, ZOW, VADODARA

Sampling locations

 

Date of monitoring

Parameters

 

 

 

pH

TSS

TDS

COD

BOD

NH3-N

CN

Phenol

S

O&G

 

Inlet Design Norms

5.0-8.5

150

12000

1000

200

 

Inlet to FETP

28.01.2009

6.73

511

8553

4127

852

399.2

13.6

 

05.03.2009

7.67

747

29081

2495

733

371.3

0.27

7.35

3.87

60

 

30.06.2009

8.00

159

8500

2725

585

532

0.38

8.42

19

 

10.09.2009

8.04

638

12952

2231

646

1158

0.30

3.86

2.8

61.1

 

10.12.2009

6.66

420

7896

2038

683

585

8.84

 

10.03.10

7.99

209

11059

2809

549

391

 

10.03.10(C)

8.07

465

6881

2598

728

594

 

Final Outlet

28.01.2009

7.97

430

9151

4158

728

642.6

19.33

65.9

47

 

05.03.2009

8.20

397

11853

2779

630

690.4

0.21

9.37

62.5

19.5

 

30.06.2009

7.82

327

9164

1764

556

475

0.19

8.04

18

 

10.09.2009

7.55

173

8798

702

39

586

0.34

0.82

0.5

13.9

 

10.12.2009

7.11

496

11228

1510

294

785

4.84

 

10.03.10

7.78

371

12413

1241

380

666

1.61

3.41

13.1

59

 

10.03.10(C)

405

9823

1498

394

664

2.12

2.75

10.4

GPCB Outlet Norms

 

6.5-8.5

100

500

100

50

0.2

5

5

20

 


VADODARA

CENTRAL POLUTION CONTROL BOARD, West Zone Office, Vadodara

ANALYSIS RESULTS OF MONITORING CARRIED OUT AT M/ ECPL

Date of Sampling: 18.02.2010                                                                                                                 Type of Sampling: Grab

 

Sampling Location(s)

 

pH

TSS

TDS

COD

BOD

NH3-N

TKN

Cl

CN

Phenols

Inlets to ECP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dhanora (Take Off Point), ECP

Inlet Sump PS-I

 

7.22

238

14616

691

137

443

473

7139

0.414

6.80

 

Inlet Sump PS-2

 

7.35

27

3253

89

17

3.8

6.32

1391

0.105

2.42

 

Inlet Sump RIL (IPCL) 1 & 2

 

9.56

69

2273

68

9.7

10.6

12.2

942

0.014

1.243

Koyali Point (@ 2.5 from Dhanora)

Inlet Sump GSFC

7.72

39

2446

185

41

20

32

734

0.063

1.11

 

Along the ECP

ECP-1,

Just after Dhanora Take Off Point i.e. Start of Channel (Mix effluent from PS-I, PS-II & RIL )

7.88

129

6709

423

50

177

189

3100

0.856

3.92

 

ECP-2,

Near Mujpur Village crossing (@ 20 km d/s of Dhanora Take off Point)

7.58

94

5481

611

57

195

217

2136

0.793

12.76

 

ECP-3,

J-Point  (Final discharge Point, end of Channel, @ 55 km from d/s of Dhanora Take off Point )

4.60

361

14458

1826

334

387

419

3665

2.857

15.37

 

GPCB Norms

 

6.5-8.5

100

5000

250

100

50

600

0.2

1.0

 

CENTRAL POLUTION CONTROL BOARD, West Zone Office, Vadodara

ANALYSIS RESULTS OF MONITORING CARRIED OUT AT M/ ECPL

Date of sample collection: 10.03.2008, 27.03.2008, 28.03.2008                                                   Type of sample collection: Grab

Sampling Location(s)

Date of Sampling

pH

TSS

COD

BOD

NH3-N

TKN

Cl

CN

Phenols

@ 2 kms downstream from start of  Channel (ECP), Dhanora Take off Point

10.03.2008

7.44

63

338

47

35

59

1797

0.03

0.20

 

27.03.2008, night time

7.7

69

407

25

35

39

1580

0.08

0.71

 

28.03.2008, morning time

7.1

54

357

28

13

50

1602

0.11

1.52

 

28.03.2008, afternoon

7.0

77

594

26

50

82

2753

0.15

8.23

 

@9 kms downstream from  Dhanora Take off Point

10.03.2008

8.01

55

247

42

35

51

876

0.02

0.29

 

27.03.2008, night time

7.0

79

428

21

51

65

2572

0.011

0.43

 

28.03.2008, morning time

8.1

117

1667

76

57

67

2414

0.16

18.67

 

28.03.2008, afternoon

8.6

141

1806

184

81

235

4062

0.23

21.87

 

Near village Vedach (2 kms upward) @ 36 km from Dhanora Take off Point

10.03.2008

7.75

135

784

243

112

126

2879

0.02

0.34

 

27.03.2008, night time

2.1

94

1600

109

49

93

2617

0.01

0.82

 

28.03.2008, morning time

2.6

115

4216

1320

134

152

4535

0.03

1.22

 

28.03.2008, afternoon

3.8

476

2083

492

127

148

3136

0.001

0.960

 

J point, End of Channel (ECP) @ 55 Km from Dhanora Take Off Point, effluent  discharging into  estuary of river Mahi, Gulf of Cambay

10.03.2008

1.1

193

1490

254

96

171

6543

0.80

0.58

 

27.03.2008, night time

7.0

540

941

163

149

171

3746

0.05

4.12

 

28.03.2008, morning time

3.4

480

2419

343

61

87

30263

0.06

5.88

 

28.03.2008, afternoon

4.8

560

1776

219

79.0

105

2256

0.07

2.10

GPCB Norms

6.5-8.5

100

250

100

50

600

0.2

1.0


 

CENTRAL POLUTION CONTROL BOARD,

West Zone Office, Vadodara

EFFLUENT QUALITY AT J-POINT, END OF ECP, DISCHARGE INTO ESTURY OF RIVER MAHI, GULF OF CAMBAY

Sampling Location(s)

Year of Monitoring

Date of Sampling

pH

TSS

COD

BOD

NH3-N

TKN

Cl

CN

Phenols

J point, End of Channel (ECP) @ 55 Km from Dhanora Take Off Point, effluent  discharging into  estuary of river Mahi, Gulf of Cambay

2008

10.03.2008

 

1.1

193

1490

254

96

171

6543

0.80

0.58

 

 

27.03.2008, night time

 

7.0

540

941

163

149

171

3746

0.05

4.12

 

 

28.03.2008, morning time

3.4

480

2419

343

61

87

30263

0.06

5.88

 

 

28.03.2008, afternoon time

 

4.8

560

1776

219

79.0

105

2256

0.07

2.10

 

2010

18.02.2010

 

4.6

361

1826

334

387

419

3665

2.86

15.37

GPCB Norms

6.5-8.5

100

250

100

50

600

0.2

1.0

 


Performance of CETP, Nandesari

Date of Monitoring

Locations

Parameters

 

 

pH

TSS

TDS

COD

BOD

NH-3-N

O&G

Phenol

CN

19/01/10

Inlet

8.0

492

21130

1371

242

272

 

Outlet

6.83

338

42677

465

170

17

7.7

0.046

2.12

19/02/10

Inlet

8.28

1118

31262

1857

569

266

2.23

 

Outlet of Eqt Tank

7.76

184

33705

2737

607

1351

5.63

1.14

 

Outlet

 

8.50

329

17836

1090

57

480

4.6

0.67

0.063


AHMEDABAD

Performance of CETP Vatva, Ahmedabad

Date of Monitoring

Locations

Parameters

 

 

pH

TSS

TDS

COD

BOD

NH-3-N

O&G

Phenol

27/01/2010

Inlet

6.40

550

20739

3696

994

134

 

Outlet

7.48

839

16141

2189

367

190

26

7.25

 

Performance of CETP M/s GECSL, Vatva, Ahmedabad

Date of Monitoring

Locations

Parameters

 

 

pH

TSS

TDS

COD

BOD

NH-3-N

O&G

Phenol

29/01/2010

Inlet

6.42

220

3851

1496

648

8.6

0.38

 

Outlet

6.43

195

2506

1100

372

6.9

1.1

0.35



Performance of CETP M/sGVMSAVL, Odhav, Ahmedabad

Date of Monitoring

Locations

Parameters

 

 

pH

TSS

TDS

COD

BOD

NH-3-N

O&G

Phenol

28/01/2010

Inlet

6.18

3555

10243

3447

1500

370

4.63

 

Outlet

7.27

888

6928

7315

2800

1260

5.4

4.13

 

Performance of  CETP M/sOEPL Odhav, Ahmedabad

Date of Monitoring

Location

Parameters

 

 

pH

TSS

TDS

COD

BOD

NH-3-N

O&G

Phenol

29/01/2010

Inlet

7.08

313

12306

1397

256

52

1.79

 

Outlet

6.65

96

9391

478

119

22

1.4

0.41

 

Performance of CETP M/s, NEPL, Naroda, Ahmedabad

Date of Monitoring

Locations

Parameters

 

 

pH

TSS

TDS

COD

BOD

NH-3 N

O&G

Phenol

28/01/2010

Inlet

7.27

2133

62350

12778

1856

1042

28.75

 

Outlet

7.16

164

11971

2471

584

190

8.2

1.62

 

Performance of CETP M/s, Narol Dyestuff Enviro Society, Narol, Ahmedabad

Date of Monitoring

Location

Parameters

 

 

pH

TSS

TDS

COD

BOD

NH-3 N

O&G

Phenol

29/01/2010

Inlet

7.0

70

26226

3267

951

77

0.39

 

Outlet

8.21

155

5869

579

60

10

6.7

0.44

RELATED ARTICLES

The Struggle for Food Sovereignty in Tunisia

Details Published on Wednesday 07 November 2018 16:20 Written by Radical Socialist

IPCC recognizes inequality as a key for “climate risk”. But we must go much further than that.

Details Published on Saturday 19 April 2014 10:40 Written by Radical Socialist

Most Popular

Algeria No to neoliberalism

Details Published on Saturday 22 January 2011 18:05 Written by Radical Socialist Algeria   No to neoliberalism! No to the free market! For a politics that serves the needs of...

Globalisation in India and Women

Details Published on Monday 19 October 2009 16:25 Written by Radical Socialist

China’s rise as a world power

Details Published on Sunday 16 June 2019 12:04 Written by Radical Socialist by Ashley Smith, Au Loong-Yu China’s rapid rise as a new center of capital accumulation has increasingly brought...

Ranil is the best friend of Mahinda regime

Details Published on Sunday 19 September 2010 15:12 Written by Radical Socialist Statement of the Nava Sama Samaj Party (Sri Lankan Section of the Fourth International) (13 September 2010) The...

Gaza Flotilla attack: end impunity for Israel’s crimes!

Details Published on Monday 07 June 2010 17:57Written by Radical Socialist

Charlie Hebdo “ And now what? The events, their impact and the issues at play

Details Published on Friday 06 Feburary 2015 17:13 Written by Radical Socialist The  article Cynicism of colour-blind equal opportunity racism has generated some debates among our readers....

From Water Wars to the Fight for Climate Justice

Details Published on Saturday 07 July 2010 16:59 Written by Radical Socialist

Suggested paths to 21st century socialism in Venezuela

Details Published on Thursday 08 July 2010 04:48 Written by Radical Socialist Eric Toussaint     Reduce dependency on hydrocarbons and on the United States   One of the challenges that several previous...

Fight over Succession in China

Details Published on Saturday 22 December 2012 15:10 Written by Radical Socialist The Fall of Socialism in One City And the Fight over Succession in China Au Loong Yu On November...

Interview with Gilbert Achcar on anti-Muslim video and political rights

Details Published on Sunday 30 September 2012 04:39 Written by Radical Socialist Anyone incensed by symbolic violence, such as the video in the US or cartoons in France,...